Recent Changes

Example 2: In the story the author implies that saving money for the lives of children in need is something really good, which it is indeed. But is it also nice to buy things with that money? It's the same thing.
Example 3: In the story, the author implies that we should somehow take a utilitarianism point of view when it deals giving to the poor. In the example of the child and the railroad crossing, the man decided not to help the child which was morally wrong since he did not think about the life he was to save and he only thought about the luxuries his car would bring him.
Your thesis certainly works, however, your evidence is missing a bit of info (insert a few short quotations).
Grade: 80

What would be the positive aspects of assaulting Cambodia
How did the government behave like a “herd of sheep” during and after Vietnam?
Chapter 13
Which writers influenced socialism in the 1900's, and how do some of their works connect to this issue?
How did the events preceeding the financial collapse in 1907 cause such panic?
Taylorism, did it help/ harm and how?
Describe the conditons in these factories.
What does this piece of the United Mine Workers of America's preamble mean, "There can be no peace so long as hunger"?
Who are the Wobblies?
Why is the IWW slogan "One big Union?"
What made the arrest of Jack White in 1912 so remarkable?
What lead to the descision taken on march 14 1812?
How were the conditions for women in one Town in Massachusetts?

Chapter 20
Why was the public opinion of the government negative in the seventies?
What was the significance of the Watergate scandal?
How were the allegations made towards Nixon detrimental to the public opinion of the nation?
What new things in government did the seventies make popular that are still popular today?
How did corporate backing in government become a permanent thing?
How was having friends in both parties helpful to corporations?
Why did most of the Establishment give up on Vietnam?
What things led up to the public opinion that the government lies to us?
What would be the positive aspects of assaulting Cambodia
How did the government behave like a “herd of sheep” during and after Vietnam?

however it may become more sophisticated in the future. also increases productivity and efficiency.
Textual Evidence: "Hooked. Is this leisure-this browsing, randomly linking my way through...the content of the web aspires to absolute variety." This quote means that he is addicted to the internet, and you can sink many hours into it. All the things that the web has to offer will allow you to waste as much time as you want.

Thesis: The internet is a place where you can waste time, however it may become more sophisticated in the future.
Textual Evidence: "Hooked. Is this leisure-this browsing, randomly linking my way through...the content of the web aspires to absolute variety." This quote means that he is addicted to the internet, and you can sink many hours into it. All the things that the web has to offer will allow you to waste as much time as you want.

Americans should donate their excess money to charity instead of buying luxuries with it, becauseWorld Poverty can be eliminated if we could save the lives of many children in third-world countries,all thought less about ourselves and if we do not help them then it is morally wrong, because it is essentially the same as letting the child die.more about other people.
Example 1: The author asks us what the difference is between someone who sold a child to organ peddlers and someone in America who buys things that could have been donated to children in third-world countries. With this statement, he is saying that the ethics in both situations are the same, and we should do more to help people in need.
that money? IsIt's the same
Example 3: In the story, the author implies that we should somehow take a utilitarianism point of view when it deals giving to the poor. In the example of the child and the railroad crossing, the man decided not to help the child which was morally wrong since he did not think about the life he was to save and he only thought about the luxuries his car would bring him.

Example 1: The author asks us what the difference is between someone who sold a child to organ peddlers and someone in America who buys things that could have been donated to children in third-world countries. With this statement, he is saying that the ethics in both situations are the same, and we should do more to help people in need.
Example 2: In the story the author implies that saving money for the lives of children in need is something really good, which it is indeed. But is it also nice to buy things with that money? Is the same thing.
Example 3: In the story, the author implies that we should somehow take a utilitarianism point of view when it deals giving to the poor. In the example of the child and the railroad crossing, the man decided not to help the child which was morally wrong since he did not think about the life he was to save and he only thought about the luxuries his car would bring him.

child die.
Example 1: The author asks us what the difference is between someone who sold a child to organ peddlers and someone in America who buys things that could have been donated to children in third-world countries. With this statement, he is saying that the ethics in both situations are the same, and we should do more to help people in need.
Example 2: In the story the author implies that saving money for the lives of children in need is something really good, which it is indeed. But is it also nice to buy things with that money? Is the same thing.

Americans should donate their excess money to charity instead of buying luxuries with it, because we could save the lives of many children in third-world countries, and if we do not help them then it is morally wrong, because it is essentially the same as letting the child die.
Example 1: The author asks us what the difference is between someone who sold a child to organ peddlers and someone in America who buys things that could have been donated to children in third-world countries. With this statement, he is saying that the ethics in both situations are the same, and we should do more to help people in need.